Skip to content. Skip to navigation
Personal tools
  Members Area  

ANZCA

Sections
You are here: Home Events ANZCA Annual Scientific Meetings 2003 ASM TOWARDS A RATIONAL NOMENCLATURE FOR CLINICAL PAIN PROBLEMS
Navigation
News
19-11-2008
Conflict of Interest policy
At ANZCA’s October Council meeting, a Conflict of Interest policy was approved. The purpose of the policy is to provide guidance in identifying and handling potential and actual conflicts of interest involving the College and its activities.
17-11-2008
New assessment processes - International Medical Graduate Specialists
ANZCA Council has agreed to a new process for the assessment of International Medical Graduate Specialists (IMGS). The new IMGS process, which becomes effective from January 1, 2009, has been redesigned in consultation with the Australian Medical Council , the Medical Boards and Government
14-11-2008
Online Journal Outage
Please be advised that due to a software upgrade, the following library resources will be unavailable on Wednesday the 19th of November from approximately 9.30am to 4.00pm AEST.
06-11-2008
Resource of the Month - November 2008
More news…
 
Document Actions

TOWARDS A RATIONAL NOMENCLATURE FOR CLINICAL PAIN PROBLEMS

Associate Professor Milton Cohen - St Vincent's Campus, Sydney

Why is a distinction made between musculoskeletal pain and neuropathic pain "syndromes", which implies that they are alternatives? In fact, as "musculoskeletal" describes the region in which the conscious subject appreciates the pain and "neuropathic" implies a mechanism of production of pain, it follows that the two terms are complementary. Furthermore, they provide the basis for a rational nomenclature based on recent insights gained from the neurobiology of nociception and pain.

The ground rules for this exercise in nomenclature are:

  1. pain itself cannot be the diagnosis;
  2. a distinction must be made between features which constitute a "syndrome" and those which allow inference of a mechanism;
  3. the adjective "neuropathic" is itself problematic in this context, as its common usage extends well beyond its noun, neuropathy.

     

    The task of the clinician when confronted with a patient's painful body part is to infer the site of origin of the pain and its mechanism of production, rather than impose a spurious diagnostic label. We propose the following matrix: [inferred mechanism] + [site of pain]. For example, a painful, warm, swollen wrist, conventionally labelled arthritis of the wrist, would be better termed [wrist] [inflammation] (noun-noun) or [inflammatory] [wrist impairment] (adjective-noun). But how do we label a mechanically sensitive, painful wrist without other signs of inflammation, implying neuropathic mechanism - [neuropathic] [wrist impairment] or [wrist] [x] ? As yet there is no noun derived from "neuropathic" analogous to "inflammation" from "inflammatory". We suggest "neurosensitisation", which incorporates current concepts of nociception. Thus we could label the problem [wrist] [neurosensitisation].

    Further examples of the rational application of this matrix will be presented and the advantages and limitations of such a rubric discussed.


    Time of Presentation:

      Saturday 3 May 2003 - 1545-1558

     

    Additional Authors:

    • Dr John Quintner - Wyllie Arthritis Centre, Perth, WA

     

    Biography:

      Milton Cohen is Vice-Dean and Education Officer of the Faculty of Pain Medicine. His interests are rational assessment and management of chronic pain, placebo theory and the structure of medical knowledge.