Personal tools
  Members Area  

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
You are here: Home Events ANZCA Annual Scientific Meetings 2005 ASM BIS is unnecessary and inaccurate

BIS is unnecessary and inaccurate

View Slides

Kate Leslie
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital

The Bispectral Index (BIS; Aspect Medical Systems Inc.) is reported to aid in the titration of anaesthesia [1] and reduce the incidence of awareness [2]. However, significant concerns remain within the anaesthetic community about the necessity for and accuracy of BIS monitoring (or any other type of depth of anaesthesia monitoring) [3]. These concerns include:

  1. Unusually low baseline values in awake patients [4]
  2. Agent-dependent effects (ketamine [5]; nitrous oxide [6]; halothane [7])
  3. Interference from electrical equipment in the operating theatre [8]
  4. EMG interference and controversial effects of muscle relaxants [9] [10]
  5. The interpretation of burst suppression by the algorithm [11] [12]
  6. Reports of awareness in BIS-monitored patients [2]
  7. The real benefits of improved recovery times [13] [14]
  8. The effects of anaesthetic depth and BIS monitoring on long-term outcome [15]
  9. Whether other monitors are worse, better or the same [16] [17]

Time of Presentation
Sunday 8 May 2005 - 1330-1500

References

1. Gan TJ et al: Bispectral Index monitoring allows faster emergence and improved recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997, 87:808-815.

Document Actions