Skip to content. Skip to navigation
Personal tools
  Members Area  

ANZCA

Sections
You are here: Home Resources Regulations Regulation 27
Navigation
News
14-10-2008
ANZCA e-newsletter - out now
Issue 3 of ANZCA’s e-newsletter has now been sent. Look out for your copy in your inbox now.
14-10-2008
ANZCA Curriculum Review – Have your say!
The ANZCA Curriculum Review Working Group (CRWG) would like to invite submissions from any individual or group with an interest in the ANZCA Training Program and/or ANZCA Clinical Teacher Development and Support Initiatives. Submissions will be open until 31 December 2008.
13-10-2008
Obstetric Anaesthesia: Scientific Evidence Guidelines
The Obstetric Anaesthesia Special Interest Group have created a series of guidelines based on scientific evidence to meet the needs of anaesthetists in our region.
01-10-2008
30 September 2008 - New items
26-09-2008
September 2008
More news…
 
Document Actions

Regulation 27

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF ANAESTHETISTS (ASSISTANCE TO OUTSIDE BODIES)

College Arms

Australian and New Zealand
College of Anaesthetists
ABN  82 055 042 852

 

ANZCA does not assess performance of specialists, however, on request, the College will provide advice to the relevant National and State/Territory Authorities in Australia, and in New Zealand.  The College must assist with the review of clinical performance of an anaesthetist when this is considered necessary for the purpose of ensuring patient safety.

The following principles will be adopted by the College:

27.1   Selection and Appointment of Assessors

The College will nominate Fellows to form a panel from which the relevant regulatory authority or employer may choose Fellows to assist with performance review.

27.2   Duties of Assessors

Assessors selected from the panel by the relevant regulatory authority or employer will act entirely on behalf of the authority requesting the review, which will indemnify the assessors, and provide for any expenses involved in the review.

27.3   Performance Review in Anaesthesia

Assessors conducting a performance review will utilise the methods chosen by the regulatory authority or employer, which may include, but are not limited to:

27.3.1   review of participation in Continuing Professional Development Programs such as MOPS.

27.3.2   review of relevant clinical records.

27.3.3   audit of processes used for patient management.

27.3.4   structured discussions with medical and non-medical staff involved with the work of the doctor being reviewed.

27.3.5   consideration of information produced by, or on behalf of the doctor being reviewed.

27.3.6   discussion with the doctor being reviewed.

27.4   Report of the Review Panel

The review panel will report to the authority requesting the review.  The report will be provided to the doctor being reviewed unless this will be done by the authority requesting the review.

27.5   Responsibilities of the College if Retraining is Required

Should the authority requesting the review then request that the College co-ordinate retraining, the College may assist with placement of the doctor for retraining; will recommend an appropriate Fellow to the assessing authority to oversight retraining for the authority; and may nominate a mentor acceptable to the doctor.

6/04